Does SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition does not support SAN ?

Microsoft web site says SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition supports SAN
protocols by using the Virtual Interface Architecture (VIA), but it doesn't
say explicitly : whether SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition also supports VIA.
So I don't know do I have to buy the Enterprise Edition if I want to use SAN
as the storage area for my SQL 2000 application.
Can anybody help me on it because the Enterprise Edition is much expensive
than the Standard Edition.No, Standard edition does not support SAN. Check
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/features/choosing.asp.
--
Dejan Sarka, SQL Server MVP
Associate Mentor
Solid Quality Learning
More than just Training
www.SolidQualityLearning.com
"cpchan" <cpchaney@.netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:c7kl9m$1i61212@.imsp212.netvigator.com...
> Microsoft web site says SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition supports SAN
> protocols by using the Virtual Interface Architecture (VIA), but it
doesn't
> say explicitly : whether SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition also supports
VIA.
> So I don't know do I have to buy the Enterprise Edition if I want to use
SAN
> as the storage area for my SQL 2000 application.
> Can anybody help me on it because the Enterprise Edition is much expensive
> than the Standard Edition.
>|||To add to Dejan's response, the SAN acronym has 2 completely different
meanings depending on the context. SAN can refer to a Storage Area Network
or a System Area Network. All editions of SQL Server support Storage Area
Networks, which is a common data storage technology. You don't need
Enterprise Edition for this.
However, SQL Server Enterprise Edition is needed to support System Area
Network, which provides a high-speed network communication between different
servers.
--
Hope this helps.
Dan Guzman
SQL Server MVP
"cpchan" <cpchaney@.netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:c7kl9m$1i61212@.imsp212.netvigator.com...
> Microsoft web site says SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition supports SAN
> protocols by using the Virtual Interface Architecture (VIA), but it
doesn't
> say explicitly : whether SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition also supports
VIA.
> So I don't know do I have to buy the Enterprise Edition if I want to use
SAN
> as the storage area for my SQL 2000 application.
> Can anybody help me on it because the Enterprise Edition is much expensive
> than the Standard Edition.
>|||Thanks for your reply.
I mean 'Storage Area Network'.
"Dan Guzman" <danguzman@.nospam-earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:ejil$OdNEHA.3052@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> To add to Dejan's response, the SAN acronym has 2 completely different
> meanings depending on the context. SAN can refer to a Storage Area
Network
> or a System Area Network. All editions of SQL Server support Storage Area
> Networks, which is a common data storage technology. You don't need
> Enterprise Edition for this.
> However, SQL Server Enterprise Edition is needed to support System Area
> Network, which provides a high-speed network communication between
different
> servers.
> --
> Hope this helps.
> Dan Guzman
> SQL Server MVP
> "cpchan" <cpchaney@.netvigator.com> wrote in message
> news:c7kl9m$1i61212@.imsp212.netvigator.com...
> > Microsoft web site says SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition supports SAN
> > protocols by using the Virtual Interface Architecture (VIA), but it
> doesn't
> > say explicitly : whether SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition also supports
> VIA.
> > So I don't know do I have to buy the Enterprise Edition if I want to use
> SAN
> > as the storage area for my SQL 2000 application.
> > Can anybody help me on it because the Enterprise Edition is much
expensive
> > than the Standard Edition.
> >
> >
>

Does SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition does not support SAN ?

Microsoft web site says SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition supports SAN
protocols by using the Virtual Interface Architecture (VIA), but it doesn't
say explicitly : whether SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition also supports VIA.
So I don't know do I have to buy the Enterprise Edition if I want to use SAN
as the storage area for my SQL 2000 application.
Can anybody help me on it because the Enterprise Edition is much expensive
than the Standard Edition.
No, Standard edition does not support SAN. Check
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluat.../choosing.asp.
Dejan Sarka, SQL Server MVP
Associate Mentor
Solid Quality Learning
More than just Training
www.SolidQualityLearning.com
"cpchan" <cpchaney@.netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:c7kl9m$1i61212@.imsp212.netvigator.com...
> Microsoft web site says SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition supports SAN
> protocols by using the Virtual Interface Architecture (VIA), but it
doesn't
> say explicitly : whether SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition also supports
VIA.
> So I don't know do I have to buy the Enterprise Edition if I want to use
SAN
> as the storage area for my SQL 2000 application.
> Can anybody help me on it because the Enterprise Edition is much expensive
> than the Standard Edition.
>
|||To add to Dejan's response, the SAN acronym has 2 completely different
meanings depending on the context. SAN can refer to a Storage Area Network
or a System Area Network. All editions of SQL Server support Storage Area
Networks, which is a common data storage technology. You don't need
Enterprise Edition for this.
However, SQL Server Enterprise Edition is needed to support System Area
Network, which provides a high-speed network communication between different
servers.
Hope this helps.
Dan Guzman
SQL Server MVP
"cpchan" <cpchaney@.netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:c7kl9m$1i61212@.imsp212.netvigator.com...
> Microsoft web site says SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition supports SAN
> protocols by using the Virtual Interface Architecture (VIA), but it
doesn't
> say explicitly : whether SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition also supports
VIA.
> So I don't know do I have to buy the Enterprise Edition if I want to use
SAN
> as the storage area for my SQL 2000 application.
> Can anybody help me on it because the Enterprise Edition is much expensive
> than the Standard Edition.
>
|||Thanks for your reply.
I mean 'Storage Area Network'.
"Dan Guzman" <danguzman@.nospam-earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:ejil$OdNEHA.3052@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> To add to Dejan's response, the SAN acronym has 2 completely different
> meanings depending on the context. SAN can refer to a Storage Area
Network
> or a System Area Network. All editions of SQL Server support Storage Area
> Networks, which is a common data storage technology. You don't need
> Enterprise Edition for this.
> However, SQL Server Enterprise Edition is needed to support System Area
> Network, which provides a high-speed network communication between
different[vbcol=seagreen]
> servers.
> --
> Hope this helps.
> Dan Guzman
> SQL Server MVP
> "cpchan" <cpchaney@.netvigator.com> wrote in message
> news:c7kl9m$1i61212@.imsp212.netvigator.com...
> doesn't
> VIA.
> SAN
expensive
>
sql

Does SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition does not support SAN ?

Microsoft web site says SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition supports SAN
protocols by using the Virtual Interface Architecture (VIA), but it doesn't
say explicitly : whether SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition also supports VIA.
So I don't know do I have to buy the Enterprise Edition if I want to use SAN
as the storage area for my SQL 2000 application.
Can anybody help me on it because the Enterprise Edition is much expensive
than the Standard Edition.No, Standard edition does not support SAN. Check
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evalua...s/choosing.asp.
Dejan Sarka, SQL Server MVP
Associate Mentor
Solid Quality Learning
More than just Training
www.SolidQualityLearning.com
"cpchan" <cpchaney@.netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:c7kl9m$1i61212@.imsp212.netvigator.com...
> Microsoft web site says SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition supports SAN
> protocols by using the Virtual Interface Architecture (VIA), but it
doesn't
> say explicitly : whether SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition also supports
VIA.
> So I don't know do I have to buy the Enterprise Edition if I want to use
SAN
> as the storage area for my SQL 2000 application.
> Can anybody help me on it because the Enterprise Edition is much expensive
> than the Standard Edition.
>|||To add to Dejan's response, the SAN acronym has 2 completely different
meanings depending on the context. SAN can refer to a Storage Area Network
or a System Area Network. All editions of SQL Server support Storage Area
Networks, which is a common data storage technology. You don't need
Enterprise Edition for this.
However, SQL Server Enterprise Edition is needed to support System Area
Network, which provides a high-speed network communication between different
servers.
Hope this helps.
Dan Guzman
SQL Server MVP
"cpchan" <cpchaney@.netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:c7kl9m$1i61212@.imsp212.netvigator.com...
> Microsoft web site says SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition supports SAN
> protocols by using the Virtual Interface Architecture (VIA), but it
doesn't
> say explicitly : whether SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition also supports
VIA.
> So I don't know do I have to buy the Enterprise Edition if I want to use
SAN
> as the storage area for my SQL 2000 application.
> Can anybody help me on it because the Enterprise Edition is much expensive
> than the Standard Edition.
>|||Thanks for your reply.
I mean 'Storage Area Network'.
"Dan Guzman" <danguzman@.nospam-earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:ejil$OdNEHA.3052@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> To add to Dejan's response, the SAN acronym has 2 completely different
> meanings depending on the context. SAN can refer to a Storage Area
Network
> or a System Area Network. All editions of SQL Server support Storage Area
> Networks, which is a common data storage technology. You don't need
> Enterprise Edition for this.
> However, SQL Server Enterprise Edition is needed to support System Area
> Network, which provides a high-speed network communication between
different
> servers.
> --
> Hope this helps.
> Dan Guzman
> SQL Server MVP
> "cpchan" <cpchaney@.netvigator.com> wrote in message
> news:c7kl9m$1i61212@.imsp212.netvigator.com...
> doesn't
> VIA.
> SAN
expensive[vbcol=seagreen]
>

Does Sql Ce 3.5 beta version support remote access in Intranet

I need to connect to a sql ce data file via Intranet .
Does sql ce support that ?
When I attempt to connect that remote file, it show me the error message
"There is a file sharing violation .A different process migth be using this file".

Does this mean , I can not do this .

This means that SQL Compact is a single user, in-process database, so when opening a file on a network share it will acquire an exclusive lock to the database file. For more information, see these blog entries from Jim Wilson:

http://www.pluralsight.com/blogs/jimw/archive/2007/02/19/46151.aspx

|||Good answer .

Thank you ErikEJ

I like this forum.

Does Sql Ce 3.5 beta version support remote access in Intranet

I need to connect to a sql ce data file via Intranet .
Does sql ce support that ?
When I attempt to connect that remote file, it show me the error message
"There is a file sharing violation .A different process migth be using this file".

Does this mean , I can not do this .

This means that SQL Compact is a single user, in-process database, so when opening a file on a network share it will acquire an exclusive lock to the database file. For more information, see these blog entries from Jim Wilson:

http://www.pluralsight.com/blogs/jimw/archive/2007/02/19/46151.aspx

|||Good answer .

Thank you ErikEJ

I like this forum.

Does report support this parameters: ...&rs:Format=HTML4.0&rc:Parameters=false&ChainID:isN

hi,
I am working on some report page which will be access via URL.
And I found some old reports URL look like this:
...&rs:Format=HTML4.0&rc:Parameters=false&UserID:isNull=True...
What does the UserID:IsNull=True means? Is this right format for
SSRS2005?
ThanksIt means you have a parameter defined for your report called UserID and
you're setting its value to null via the URL.
Andy Potter|||Oh, ic, Thanks

Does report support this parameters: ...&rs:Format=HTML4.0&rc:Parameters=false&Chain

hi,
I am working on some report page which will be access via URL.
And I found some old reports URL look like this:
....&rs:Format=HTML4.0&rc:Parameters=false&UserID:isNull=True....

What does the UserID:IsNull=True means? Is this right format for SSRS2005?

Thanks

The UserID:IsNull=True notation is special syntax that allows you to pass null values as report parameters. In this case, you're passing null to the UserID parameter. For more info, see Books Online here:

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms155391.aspx

Here's all the info about URL access with Reporting Services:

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms153586(en-us,SQL.90).aspx

Best,
Chris

Does not allow remote connections

I have installed SQL Server 2005 Std on an XP system for development using VS 2005. When I try to
connect to the DB via Server Management Studio, I get the message that "... does not allow remote
connections".
When I launch Surface Area Configuration and select the Surface Area Configuration for Services and
Connections, I see only 4 services listed: Analysis, Reporting, Integration and SQL Server Browser.
There is no Database Engine Service listed!
Have I installed incorrectly?
TIA LarsHello,
Please check if the following folder exist:
%programfiles%\Microsoft sql server\mssql.1\mssql\data
If it does not exist, it seems the database engine is not installed, you
may want to go to Add/Remove program to install this component.
Best Regards,
Peter Yang
MCSE2000/2003, MCSA, MCDBA
Microsoft Online Partner Support
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
=====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:47:30 -0600
>From: larzeb <larzeb@.community.nospam>
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>Subject: Does not allow remote connections
>Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 23:47:23 -0800
>Message-ID: <oeb212ljn7hj2gqd0b795dkcd0mqv6qf3h@.4ax.com>
>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Lines: 11
>X-Trace:
sv3-PjJxXeuzs9DydzPoFbzAokDHiY6O/KXDzjV8O7hEwxj/ljIdWbzP3wItPsTOueQ5nFw/SN8L
okMLvDY!lpKWpYf6RQBHuNvVXmwxsNoiCv3bMHVGU73LWN6CN48tFv9p/w4z0jbRyZAA6ZBcpvbv
WXA=>X-Complaints-To: abuse@.giganews.com
>X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
>X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
>X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
>X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
>Path:
TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onli
ne.de!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.gigan
ews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.server:423971
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>I have installed SQL Server 2005 Std on an XP system for development using
VS 2005. When I try to
>connect to the DB via Server Management Studio, I get the message that
"... does not allow remote
>connections".
>When I launch Surface Area Configuration and select the Surface Area
Configuration for Services and
>Connections, I see only 4 services listed: Analysis, Reporting,
Integration and SQL Server Browser.
>There is no Database Engine Service listed!
>Have I installed incorrectly?
>TIA Lars
>

Does not allow remote connections

I have installed SQL Server 2005 Std on an XP system for development using VS 2005. When I try to
connect to the DB via Server Management Studio, I get the message that "... does not allow remote
connections".
When I launch Surface Area Configuration and select the Surface Area Configuration for Services and
Connections, I see only 4 services listed: Analysis, Reporting, Integration and SQL Server Browser.
There is no Database Engine Service listed!
Have I installed incorrectly?
TIA Lars
Hello,
Please check if the following folder exist:
%programfiles%\Microsoft sql server\mssql.1\mssql\data
If it does not exist, it seems the database engine is not installed, you
may want to go to Add/Remove program to install this component.
Best Regards,
Peter Yang
MCSE2000/2003, MCSA, MCDBA
Microsoft Online Partner Support
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
================================================== ===
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:47:30 -0600
>From: larzeb <larzeb@.community.nospam>
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>Subject: Does not allow remote connections
>Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 23:47:23 -0800
>Message-ID: <oeb212ljn7hj2gqd0b795dkcd0mqv6qf3h@.4ax.com>
>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Lines: 11
>X-Trace:
sv3-PjJxXeuzs9DydzPoFbzAokDHiY6O/KXDzjV8O7hEwxj/ljIdWbzP3wItPsTOueQ5nFw/SN8L
okMLvDY!lpKWpYf6RQBHuNvVXmwxsNoiCv3bMHVGU73LWN6CN4 8tFv9p/w4z0jbRyZAA6ZBcpvbv
WXA=
>X-Complaints-To: abuse@.giganews.com
>X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
>X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
>X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
>X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
>Path:
TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfee d00.sul.t-online.de!t-onli
ne.de!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.d ca.giganews.com!nntp.gigan
ews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganew s.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.server:423971
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>I have installed SQL Server 2005 Std on an XP system for development using
VS 2005. When I try to
>connect to the DB via Server Management Studio, I get the message that
"... does not allow remote
>connections".
>When I launch Surface Area Configuration and select the Surface Area
Configuration for Services and
>Connections, I see only 4 services listed: Analysis, Reporting,
Integration and SQL Server Browser.
>There is no Database Engine Service listed!
>Have I installed incorrectly?
>TIA Lars
>

Does not allow remote connections

I have installed SQL Server 2005 Std on an XP system for development using V
S 2005. When I try to
connect to the DB via Server Management Studio, I get the message that "...
does not allow remote
connections".
When I launch Surface Area Configuration and select the Surface Area Configu
ration for Services and
Connections, I see only 4 services listed: Analysis, Reporting, Integration
and SQL Server Browser.
There is no Database Engine Service listed!
Have I installed incorrectly?
TIA LarsHello,
Please check if the following folder exist:
%programfiles%\Microsoft sql server\mssql.1\mssql\data
If it does not exist, it seems the database engine is not installed, you
may want to go to Add/Remove program to install this component.
Best Regards,
Peter Yang
MCSE2000/2003, MCSA, MCDBA
Microsoft Online Partner Support
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
========================================
=============
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:47:30 -0600
>From: larzeb <larzeb@.community.nospam>
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>Subject: Does not allow remote connections
>Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 23:47:23 -0800
>Message-ID: <oeb212ljn7hj2gqd0b795dkcd0mqv6qf3h@.4ax.com>
>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Lines: 11
>X-Trace:
sv3-PjJxXeuzs9DydzPoFbzAokDHiY6O/KXDzjV8O7hEwxj/ljIdWbzP3wItPsTOueQ5nFw/SN8L
okMLvDY!lpKWpYf6RQBHuNvVXmwxsNoiCv3bMHVG
U73LWN6CN48tFv9p/w4z0jbRyZAA6ZBcpvbv
WXA=
>X-Complaints-To: abuse@.giganews.com
>X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
>X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
>X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
>X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
>Path:
TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onli
ne.de!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.gigan
ews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.server:423971
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>I have installed SQL Server 2005 Std on an XP system for development using
VS 2005. When I try to
>connect to the DB via Server Management Studio, I get the message that
"... does not allow remote
>connections".
>When I launch Surface Area Configuration and select the Surface Area
Configuration for Services and
>Connections, I see only 4 services listed: Analysis, Reporting,
Integration and SQL Server Browser.
>There is no Database Engine Service listed!
>Have I installed incorrectly?
>TIA Lars
>

Does LoadFromSqlServer2 method work?

Hi. There's little documentation on the Microsoft.SqlServer.Dts.Runtime.Application "LoadFromSqlServer2" method, and even less via any search engine.

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.sqlserver.dts.runtime.application.loadfromsqlserver2.aspx

I cannot seem to ever get the method to work; it returns "InvalidCastException: No such interface supported."

Is this code-speak for "does not work at this time" ?

Sample code (add a reference to c:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\SDK\Assemblies\Microsoft.SQLServer.ManagedDTS.dll)

Dim app As New Microsoft.SqlServer.Dts.Runtime.Application

Dim pkg As Microsoft.SqlServer.Dts.Runtime.Package

Dim cnDatasource As New System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection

cnDatasource.ConnectionString = _

"Data Source=SQLOLEDB;SERVER=" & m_Datasource & ";Initial Catalog=msdb;Integrated Security=SSPI"

cnDatasource.Open()

pkg = app.LoadFromSqlServer2(m_PackageFolderPath & m_PackageName, cnDatasource, Nothing)

I am aware of the "LoadFromSqlServer" and "LoadFromDtsServer" methods; I like the idea of the Win-NT authentication (theoretically) available in the "LoadFromSqlServer2" method.

Did you read the first line of that link you sent?

"This method supports the SQL Server 2005 infrastructure and is not intended to be used directly from your code. "

|||

I guess I didn't. I've not met documentation that I wasn't supposed to use.

Thanks for the fact... it would have really been useful.

does importing a trace file via FN_TRACE_GETTABLE use the tempDB?

i need to look at some large trace files (3 - 8 Gig). The drive that
has the tempDB on is is small..currently has < 2 G of free space on
it.
does the FN_TRACE_GETTABLE() function route the import through the
tempDB?
if so is there a way to avoid this?
I don't want to choke the root drive of the server importing this...I have not seen it being spooled on a simple select into from a trace file
but you might just want to keep an eye on it.
--
Jason Massie
Web: http://statisticsio.com
RSS: http://feeds.feedburner.com/statisticsio
<kent@.kaeservices.com> wrote in message
news:29307ecd-75d3-42e1-ba4a-06d67f0c5c14@.d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>i need to look at some large trace files (3 - 8 Gig). The drive that
> has the tempDB on is is small..currently has < 2 G of free space on
> it.
> does the FN_TRACE_GETTABLE() function route the import through the
> tempDB?
> if so is there a way to avoid this?
> I don't want to choke the root drive of the server importing this...

does importing a trace file via FN_TRACE_GETTABLE use the tempDB?

i need to look at some large trace files (3 - 8 Gig). The drive that
has the tempDB on is is small..currently has < 2 G of free space on
it.
does the FN_TRACE_GETTABLE() function route the import through the
tempDB?
if so is there a way to avoid this?
I don't want to choke the root drive of the server importing this...
I have not seen it being spooled on a simple select into from a trace file
but you might just want to keep an eye on it.
Jason Massie
Web: http://statisticsio.com
RSS: http://feeds.feedburner.com/statisticsio
<kent@.kaeservices.com> wrote in message
news:29307ecd-75d3-42e1-ba4a-06d67f0c5c14@.d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>i need to look at some large trace files (3 - 8 Gig). The drive that
> has the tempDB on is is small..currently has < 2 G of free space on
> it.
> does the FN_TRACE_GETTABLE() function route the import through the
> tempDB?
> if so is there a way to avoid this?
> I don't want to choke the root drive of the server importing this...

Does exchangeServer accept in SendMail task?

Does exchangeServer accept in SendMail task?

only SMTP?

who knows?

For internal mail server , it's only via exchange server.

Exchange supports SMTP.

Does anyone know of a web based SQL Query tool?

Hi

I want to be able t give my users access to our SQL server database via a eb application published o our web server. I have found one freeware tool but it only supports SQL Server 2000 and the developer doesn't returns any emails.

Has anyone come across a web ui SQL query tool either freeware or one that can be purhcase

thanks for your help

Marcus

Do you just want to have a tool sending out a query from a textbox and getting the results back in a grid or something ? Or do you want tome graphical designer for your users ?

HTH, Jens K. Suessmeyer.

http://www.sqlserver2005.de|||

search for

SQL Server Web Data Administrator

on microsoft website

|||

Here is the link to SQL Server Web Data Administrator

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=C039A798-C57A-419E-ACBC-2A332CB7F959&displaylang=en

Sethu Srinivasan, Software Design Engineer, SQL Server Manageability
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm.

|||ASP Enterprise Manager http://sourceforge.net/projects/asp-ent-man/

Does 2k5 Reporting Services need IIS?

I'd like to produce dynamic reports via SQL Server 2k5 Reporting
Services that can be rendered in a web browser. However, I don't want
anything to do with IIS or a web server. From what I've heard,
previous version of SQL Server Reporting Services needed IIS. Is this
true for 2k5?
Thanks,
BrettRS 2005 comes with WebForm and WinForm controls for showing reports. Also, t
hese can be client side
only (where the reporting engine is essentially built into the controls). Bu
t this is about as much
as I know. I suggest you post this to an RS forum, where you are more likely
to get a precise
response.
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
Blog: http://solidqualitylearning.com/blogs/tibor/
"brett" <account@.cygen.com> wrote in message
news:1142924193.608686.191110@.z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> I'd like to produce dynamic reports via SQL Server 2k5 Reporting
> Services that can be rendered in a web browser. However, I don't want
> anything to do with IIS or a web server. From what I've heard,
> previous version of SQL Server Reporting Services needed IIS. Is this
> true for 2k5?
> Thanks,
> Brett
>|||Yes, Reporting Services runs inside IIS.
"brett" <account@.cygen.com> wrote in message
news:1142924193.608686.191110@.z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> I'd like to produce dynamic reports via SQL Server 2k5 Reporting
> Services that can be rendered in a web browser. However, I don't want
> anything to do with IIS or a web server. From what I've heard,
> previous version of SQL Server Reporting Services needed IIS. Is this
> true for 2k5?
> Thanks,
> Brett
>

Does 2k5 Reporting Services need IIS?

I'd like to produce dynamic reports via SQL Server 2k5 Reporting
Services that can be rendered in a web browser. However, I don't want
anything to do with IIS or a web server. From what I've heard,
previous version of SQL Server Reporting Services needed IIS. Is this
true for 2k5?
Thanks,
BrettYes
"brett" <account@.cygen.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1142925712.659616.140540@.t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> I'd like to produce dynamic reports via SQL Server 2k5 Reporting
> Services that can be rendered in a web browser. However, I don't want
> anything to do with IIS or a web server. From what I've heard,
> previous version of SQL Server Reporting Services needed IIS. Is this
> true for 2k5?
> Thanks,
> Brett
>|||Also, VS 2005 comes with two controls. A winform and a webform control.
These controls can either work with RS or can run in local mode where no
server is required. It takes some more work, especially for subreports, jump
to report etc but it works quite well. In local mode you give it the report
and the data and then it renders it.
Bruce Loehle-Conger
MVP SQL Server Reporting Services
"brett" <account@.cygen.com> wrote in message
news:1142925712.659616.140540@.t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> I'd like to produce dynamic reports via SQL Server 2k5 Reporting
> Services that can be rendered in a web browser. However, I don't want
> anything to do with IIS or a web server. From what I've heard,
> previous version of SQL Server Reporting Services needed IIS. Is this
> true for 2k5?
> Thanks,
> Brett
>